• Home
  • Blog
  • Media
  • Contact Me
  • Newsletter
  • Bowlings Abroad
  • Nerd Farmer Podcast
  • Teaching Civil Liberties
  • Supporting Undocumented Students
Menu

Nate Bowling: American Teacher Abroad

Street Address
City, State, Zip
Phone Number

Your Custom Text Here

Nate Bowling: American Teacher Abroad

  • Home
  • Blog
  • Media
  • Contact Me
  • Newsletter
  • Bowlings Abroad
  • Nerd Farmer Podcast
  • Teaching Civil Liberties
  • Supporting Undocumented Students

How the Culture of the WWE Took Over US Politics

April 10, 2023 Nathan Bowling

The gap between politics and the world of pro-wrestling has become non-existent. We're seeing politicians drop "heel" promos to generate campaign donations and "heat" leaving policymaking to rot.

Throughout my career, the Sunday evening work session has become a ritual. I sit down at about four o'clock and start prepping for the week ahead. For atmosphere, I usually have some combination of Law & Order, soccer, or wrestling in the background. Wrestling is actually perfect for productivity. You can focus on your task and mostly tune it out. The crowd and announcers will signal you to tune in for the chair shot, occasional shooting star press, or the finishing move. WrestleMania XXXIX happened last week at SoFi Stadium in LA, so it was my background this weekend. 

Wrestling is theater. It’s a scripted soap opera (in tights) with feats of athleticism and risks that defy common sense. But for a person with my worldview, enjoying the product is complicated. You could build an encyclopedia of the racist and xenophobic gimmicks that have been used over the years (see below). Women’s bodies are habitually objectified. The people in charge of the two major promotions (AEW and WWE) are billionaires of questionable character, both born into wealth.

It goes deeper than that. If you look at their biographies, Donald Trump and Vince McMahon’s resumes are largely indistinguishable up until about 2015. Both inherited businesses from their fathers: Trump a real estate empire, McMahon the then WWF. Both spent much of their careers awash is scandal. McMahon was indicted in federal court in 1994, charged with providing steroids to wrestlers. He was forced to resign as chairman of WWE in 2022, after it came to light that he, like Trump, paid hush money to a mistress. Their lives are intertwined in other ways. Trump made several appearances in the WWE and was inducted into the WWE Hall of Fame in 2013 and McMahon’s wife served as a member of Trump’s Whitehouse, as administrator of the Small Business Administration. 

They are basically the same dude and I find both loathsome. I wouldn’t want someone of their character as a colleague at work or representing me in public office. 

Despite this I enjoy wrestling and can largely ignore its excesses because I understand it’s all an act. Everything is scripted, the animosity is a pantomime. The audience is mostly in on the joke. But increasingly, I find myself using the language of wrestling to describe our unfortunate period of American politics. 

When I see conservative culture warriors attacking teachers or the LGBTQ+ community, I see heels generating cheap heat. A heel in wrestling parlance is a villain in a storyline and heat is the negative response they desire from the crowd—bad guys want crowds to boo them—they want to be hated. The “own the libs” aesthetic of the modern GOP is indistinguishable from a heel wrestling promo. Earning the scorn of the establishment, helps them get more over, the wrestling term for gaining popularity, with their base. Why else would we have politicians wearing AR15 pins into congress days after school shootings? It’s heel nonsense, meant to spark outrage.

The more we revile them, the more their supporters revere them.  

The clip above is a masterclass in cheap heat, Elias earning deafening boos insulting a crowd in Seattle on Monday Night Raw in 2018.

The word kayfabe refers to the illusion that wrestling is real, unscripted—that it’s a competitive sport. When we puncture that veneer and address the sport as the scripted drama, we call it breaking kayfabe. The feigned outrages that rise up in our politics everyday feel like kayfabe. Look at events this week in Tennessee: two Black Democratic legislators were expelled from the House for breaking rules on decorum while participating in a protest against gun violence. Rep. Andrew Farmer, who has a voice that is simultaneously reminiscent of Foghorn Leghorn and a plantation owner, condemned their actions in this video.

Farmer, maintaining kayfabe, pretended to be outraged by the protest, treating it as an unprecedented breach of decorum. Rep. Justin Pearson, one of the expelled members, rightly called out the expulsion as what it was—a racially motivated power grab, overturning the will of voters in Memphis. Pearson’s response was a shoot, an unscripted breaking of kayfabe, bringing real life elements into the storyline. Pearson highlighted the hypocrisy of the GOP majority, expelling him while keeping people in the chamber accused of grave misconduct. 

I’m already dreading the ever expanding 2024 campaign that is taking shape right now. Collectively we face a number of overlapping crises and find ourselves in serious times but have a deeply unserious political culture.

But for better or worse, I am an institutionalist. I believe in democratic institutions and that government can help solve problems and make society better. But I find myself caring less and less about US national politics as it becomes more and more like pro-wrestling.

I have more to say about wrestling and politics, in particular about how progressive politicians should embrace the populist message of Dusty Rhodes’s Hard Times promo. But that will have to wait until next week.

In Politics, Society, Sports Tags WWE

The Already Forgotten War

March 19, 2023 Nathan Bowling

Tomorrow will mark the twentieth anniversary of the Iraq invasion, a competitor with the opioid crisis, Hurricane Katrina, and the 2008 financial crisis for defining event of our lifetimes. An estimated 200,000 Iraqis, 4500 US soldiers, and an additional 3000 military contractors lost their lives in Iraq

I am not the first member of my family to spend time in the Gulf. 

In 1991, when I was in seventh grade, my mom’s Army Reserve Unit, the 50th General Hospital, was activated for the first time since the Normandy landing. She was deployed to Saudi Arabia as a part of Operation Desert Shield to provide medical care in support of what would become the first of two US military invasions of Iraq. 

Military service is a tradition in my family. My father was a Warrant Officer in the Army and this was his route to the PNW. My brother was in the Army. My uncle was an Airmen, my step-father was drafted into the Army and wounded in the Vietnam War. I split the difference between my uncle and my mother and I enlisted in the US Air Force Reserves after high school. It felt like what I was supposed to do and I figured it would help pay for college. I enjoyed my time in the military. It gave me my first taste of travel—much of it in Texas.

But by mid-2002 the terrain changed. I publicly opposed the impending war in Iraq and my commentary about the war made for awkward situations during the waning days of my enlistment. I remember reading Norman Soloman’s Target Iraq and trying to explain the ways public opinion was being shaped in support of the war. I remember reading a PDF copy of Chomsky’s What Uncle Sam Really Wants and giving people highlighted copies of excerpts of the text. In 2003, I decided not to reenlist. I had become more a “college kid” than an “Airman”—those two aspects of my life having been at tension for years.

As the war went on, I remember being enraged listening to pols & pundits say “no one knew…” or “who could have foreseen…” as body counts soared and the nation soured on the war. It’s odd how clear those memories from twenty years ago are in my head because it seems like we’ve collectively forgotten about the Iraq War. 

The Iraq invasion was based on false premises from the jump.  The war was catastrophic, costing the lives of hundreds of thousands of Iraqis, wasting an estimated 2.4 trillion USD ($2,400,000,000,000) dollars of taxpayer money, and destabilizing much of the region. The war undermined American legitimacy in the region. It created a power vacuum that allowed extremist groups like ISIS to rise and allowed Iran to make the new government in Iraq another of its client states. The war inspired the largest protests in human history, damaging America's reputation and credibility with its allies. 

The Iraq invasion was a disastrous decision, a bipartisan blunder that passed  77-23 in the US Senate. All but the Ron Paul brand of Republicans were champions of the war and nearly 60% of Congressional Democrats supported it. My own Senator Maria Cantwell voted for it; 2016 Democratic Nominee, Hillary Clinton voted for it; Joe Biden voted for it, calling it “not a rush to war but a march to peace and stability.” But no one in the US political establishment ever faced any consequences for this failure. The cost was paid by the people of Iraq and the 7,000 US servicemembers and military contractors who died in the conflict. 

For my older students, the invasion is like Watergate is for people my age: a formative event with lasting repercussions that happened before I was born, like a memory belonging to someone else.

The Iraq War was the moment I learned America is allergic to holding people in power accountable. We saw this again during the 2008 crisis, poor Covid pandemic management, and are seeing it again with the current bank liquidity crisis. This allergy is arguably the defining characteristic of America’s political culture.

In Society, Politics Tags Iraq War

The Feds Were Asleep at the Switch for Crypto, AI Could Be Much Worse

February 26, 2023 Nathan Bowling

Police in Dallas used a robot, armed with a brick of C4 to kill a barricaded shooter ending a standoff in 2016—the department later fought the release of records about the decision making process leading up to the killing

An annoying part about getting older is that you realize how cyclical things are and that much of life is the same hustles and hassles with new names and labels. Whatever your thoughts about cryptocurrency (I'm a skeptic but also own a small amount), it's indisputable the sector is rife with scams, rugpulls, and unregulated securities. As a result, billions were lost in crypto hacks and scams over the last two years (see table below). This isn’t counting the firms like FTX, Celsius, and Voyager that went under, wiping out an additional 200 billion dollars from retail investors and people who trusted the shadow banks called crypto exchanges.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) finally woke up from its multi-decade slumber this month and issued massive fines against several crypto exchanges and the influencers shilling for them. Retired NBA star Paul Pierce was fined 1.4 million dollars for promoting a token called Ethereum Max. EMax was a pump & dump scheme where new investors were served up as exit-liquidity for the founders. EMax currently trades at $0.00000000099 per worthless token. Kim Kardashian was fined a similar amount for touting the same token in December. Regulators have stablecoins in their sights. Crypto exchange Kraken agreed to a 30 million dollar fine and agreed to shut down their staking program (if you don’t know what crypto staking is, you’re probably better off that way). Kraken’s rival Binance is expecting a massive fine as well.

2022 was a record year for hackers in crypto - Source: Decrypt, data from Chainalysis

The handwriting was on the wall for years about crypto scams but federal authorities waited over a decade before acting. In the interim millions of people were harmed. A regulatory framework for crypto exists and has existed since before the first token came to market. We can't afford to wait fourteen or even four years for the government to set the ground rules for AI. The potential for society wide harm is incalculably larger. 

After-the-fact debates are biased toward the expansion, rather than limitation, of a practice. In 2016, the city of Dallas had to reckon with the question of whether they would allow police to kill a barricaded shooter with a remote operated drone. They decided "yes" this is an acceptable use of force. Unfortunately, they decided it retroactively, months after the police had killed their target (with a Remotec Androx Mark V A-1, manufactured by Northrup Grumman). The police department refused to release documents related to the decision to use the robot and the city absolved the chief and the entire chain of command after the incident. The police chief, David Brown, now runs the police department in Chicago and there’s now a precedent regarding the use remote operated robots to kill people.

As venture capital abandons crypto projects, opting to fund cowboy AI projects, policymakers can't be passive. The potential harm from AI in journalism, financial markets, deep-fake aided scams, and law enforcement use of force have the potential to do far more damage than the crypto bros. Letting the DARPA and Boston Dynamic chips (see video) fall where they may is societal malpractice. If my concerns here seem alarmist to you, imagine trying to explain in-flight wifi to someone in 1994.

We can't wait to make the decision about the limits we will put on the use of AI until after they’re deployed. If you don't think there's people in law enforcement salivating to deploy AI robots and drones in low-income and Black neighborhoods, you don't know American history.

In Politics, Society Tags AI, Civil Liberties
← Newer Posts Older Posts →

POWERED BY SQUARESPACE